A Mobile Patient-Reported Outcome Measure App With Talking Touchscreen

Auteurs Marlies Welbie , Harriët Wittink , Marjan J Westerman , Ilse Topper , Josca Snoei , Walter Devill√©
Gepubliceerd in JMIR Formative Research
Publicatiedatum 27 september 2019
Lectoraat Onderzoekend Vermogen, Leefstijl en Gezondheid
Soort publicatie Artikel

Samenvatting

Background: In the past years, a mobile health (mHealth) app called the Dutch Talking Touch Screen Questionnaire (DTTSQ) was developed in The Netherlands. The aim of development was to enable Dutch physical therapy patients to autonomously complete a health-related questionnaire regardless of their level of literacy and digital skills. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability (defined as the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction) of the prototype of the DTTSQ for Dutch physical therapy patients with diverse levels of experience in using mobile technology. Methods: The qualitative Three-Step Test-Interview method, including both think-aloud and retrospective probing techniques, was used to gain insight into the usability of the DTTSQ. A total of 24 physical therapy patients were included. The interview data were analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach aimed at analyzing the accuracy and completeness with which participants completed the questionnaire (effectiveness), the time it took the participants to complete the questionnaire (efficiency), and the extent to which the participants were satisfied with the ease of use of the questionnaire (satisfaction). The problems encountered by the participants in this study were given a severity rating that was used to provide a rough estimate of the need for additional usability efforts. Results: All participants within this study were very satisfied with the ease of use of the DTTSQ. Overall, 9 participants stated that the usability of the app exceeded their expectations. The group of 4 average-/high-experienced participants encountered only 1 problem in total, whereas the 11 little-experienced participants encountered an average of 2 problems per person and the 9 inexperienced participants an average of 3 problems per person. A total of 13 different kind of problems were found during this study. Of these problems, 4 need to be addressed before the DTTSQ will be released because they have the potential to negatively influence future usage of the tool. The other 9 problems were less likely to influence future usage of the tool substantially. Conclusions: The usability of the DTTSQ needs to be improved before it can be released. No problems were found with satisfaction or efficiency during the usability test. The effectiveness needs to be improved by (1) making it easier to navigate through screens without the possibility of accidentally skipping one, (2) enabling the possibility to insert an answer by tapping on the text underneath a photograph instead of just touching the photograph itself, and (3) making it easier to correct wrong answers. This study shows the importance of including less skilled participants in a usability study when striving for inclusive design and the importance of measuring not just satisfaction but also efficiency and effectiveness during such studies.

Aan deze publicatie werkten mee

Taal Engels
Gepubliceerd in JMIR Formative Research
Jaar en volume 3 3
Trefwoorden mHealth, ehealth, surveys and questionnaires, physical therapy specialty, qualitative research
Digital Object Identifier https://doi.org/10.2196/11617

Marlies Welbie

Marlies Welbie | Onderzoeker |  Methodologie van Praktijkgericht Onderzoek

Marlies Welbie

  • Onderzoeker
  • Lectoraat: Onderzoekend Vermogen